Skip to content

Six Years Ago – Another Heinous Crime Was Committed.

July 7, 2011

7-7 Outright Terror

JULY 7th
2005, LONDON :


The July
7.05 : 07.40 : Luton to London train was cancelled. The next train to London,
the 07.48, arrived at London King’s Cross at 08.42: seven minutes before the
detonations of the first explosives on the Underground.

As the
cancellation could not have been foreseen and with it being far
too late to alter the plans, the police released the pre-prepared “four suicide
bombers took the 07.40 train” etc. statement.


London Underground – entrances, platforms, carriages, escalators – has
saturation CCTV coverage. No footage showed any evidence of “suicide bombers”.

The “four
bombers outside Luton Station” photograph – “taken from the” non-existent “CCTV
footage” – is an infantile fake : at least three of the four images have been
Photoshopped in : white-hat-man has been particularly-badly superimposed with
his body in front of the railings and half of his face and lower left arm behind
the rails : the rail sections, either side of the phantom, do not line up : at a
busy time no-one else is on the photo.

reports tell of the explosions on the underground being on the rail-tracks :
effectively ruling out any external party involvement. “The policeman said ‘mind
that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. THE METAL WAS PUSHED UPWARDS as if the
bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag,
but I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag”. Bruce
Lait, Cambridge Evening News .

“I knew
it was a bomb … A second later and the explosion would have
punched a hole in our carriage … our driver .. opened the outer door and LOOKED
AT THE TRACK AHEAD. There were huge pieces of metal, which had been ripped out
of their rivets, lying about.”

“ … there
was a woman .. who was on her back, trapped in the
was still on but the lining of the carriage had been blown off … there was a big
hole in the middle of the floor.” POLICE WOMAN Lizzie

Israeli security firm has been chosen to provide security for London’s
Underground train network. … Verint Systems, … Israeli security companies
are usually manned by Shinbet or Mossad ex-agents …”

By the
greatest of coincidences, an “anti-terrorism exercise” was
being undertaken at the same time as the “suicide bombers” struck with the same
targets at the same time.

announcement that it was, obviously, military explosives that were used, was
quickly changed to “home made” : then followed farcical raids on “home-made-bomb-factory-houses”
in Yorkshire etc. TATP MADE IN A BATHTUB.

Stagecoach employees have reported that the no. 30 bus – the
one which had the explosive device under the top- deck back-seat – was the only
bus diverted after the tube explosions . The previous Saturday, a maintenance
group, previously unknown to the depot crew, spent “20 hours” “on CCTV
maintenance” on that bus ; an unheard-of length of time for that

There has
never been any evidence, whatsover, linking the explosions with Islam or the
mythical “Al Qaeda”.

On July
21 a “failed suicide bombing” stunt was staged .This was to further the idea
that “home-made” bombs were used in the July 7 attacks. It also provided the
chance to eliminate a witness to the July 7 reality.

The Brazilian contract electrician, Jean Charles de
Menezes, executed by agents, probably had inside knowledge of the placing of the
devices and/or the mechanisn – “It was like a huge electric surge ..” Bruce Lait
– which triggered the explosives.

After 8
weeks and with the “suicide bombers” story falling further apart, the BBC Arabic
Service, Al Jazeera, broadcast a “suicide bomber” video ; an obvious fake,
parotted, uncritically, by the media. The police/BBC later came up with a
“bomber reconnoitre” video and more Al-Qaeda claims.

After 12
weeks the State produced an eye-witness to a suicide bomber detonating a bomb on
the tube.

On Oct
SAGEMAN, producer/director ALICKY SUSSMAN and editor, ANDREW COHEN to give us
another large helping of the Muslim-killer version, complete with the Photoshop
Four photograph.

(Click through to the source for full unabridged version with links. Likewise below.)

Witnesses of the tube-train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks, and no backpacks, or bags, left unattended on the trains, in the carriages that blew up, and that the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains.

Explosives underneath the train floors; powerful enough to rupture the carriage floors and bend them upwards; would also lift the carriages up off the rails and derail them, as did happen.
Those explosives were not home-made, but military-grade high-explosives, that would not be available to Muslim suicide-bombers.

The official story was that they used home-made explosives, which has later been proven to be a lie.
So we know, from reliable eye-witnesses, who can be traced, that there were no backpack home-made bombs or Muslim bombers inside the tube-train carriages that blew up, and that the floors blew upwards, so the bombs, which were made from military high-grade explosives, must have been fastened underneath the floors of the train carriages.

Only people having access to the tube-trains, during the times that the trains were not running, would be able to plant those bombs, under the train floors.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Finance Minister, said that he was warned by Scotland Yard; not to leave his hotel-room, on the morning of 7/7/2005, before the first explosion was reported; implying that they had foreknowledge of the plan.

Scotland Yard then quickly denied being the ones who provided the warning, but have not told us who did warn Netanyahu, if they did not.

Why was Benjamin Netanyahu warned, but not the British people who pay their wages, and whom they are paid to protect?

Was it because it would have spoiled their evil plan, to murder British people, to change the nation’s mind, about British troops fighting in the Middle-East?

Two weeks later the head of the Israeli Mossad, General Meir Dagan, said that he had warned Benjamin Netanyahu at 08.40 AM, on 7/7/2005, ten minutes before the first blast occurred.

How did he know what was going to happen in London, if Scotland Yard did not warn him?

Did he wait, to warn Benjamin Netanyahu, until it was too late to warn the British people, so as not to spoil their evil plan?

Was the London bombing a covert MI5 operation, or an Israeli Mossad operation, or a joint operation by both of them?

The British people have the right to know.

Tony Blair said on the day of the explosions, that, “We KNOW this was done in the name of Islam”, when there was no proof whatsoever of who had done it, therefore indicating he possibly had foreknowledge of the plan and who they intended to blame, and the reason why they were going to blame the Muslims.

As proof that this was a slip-up, and needed covering up, look at how the BBC later falsely reported his actual words, giving further proof that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and the coverage was “organised”, exactly as Michael Portillo said it would be, in the BBC Panorama programme in May 2004.

“In addition I welcome the statement that has been put out by the Muslim Council of Great Britain. We know that these people act in the name of Islam…”

“In addition, I welcome the statement put out by the Muslim Council who know that those people acted in the name of Islam…”

Later that same day, Efraim Halevi, a former head of the Israeli Mossad, wrote in an article published on the Jerusalem Post website, at 18:10 PM (London time), that the attacks had been carried out simultaneously with “near-perfect” execution.

How did he know they had only been “near-perfect”?

How could he have known what the “perfect” results should have been, in order to know that the actual results were not perfect, unless he was in on the plot?

How many more people had they intended to murder, in order for it to be considered “perfect” execution?

How did he know, at least two days before the London authorities released the information on the 9th of July, that the bombs were detonated simultaneously, unless he was in on the plot?

As proof that this too was a slip-up, the Jerusalem Post article in question was completely removed from their website, after people began to ask similar questions.

The following day Police Commissioner Ian Blair also made a slip-up, on camera, and said that there were four miserable bombers, and then very quickly corrected himself, showing that he too possibly had foreknowledge of the plan to use four Muslims as patsies.

We are told that the first reports were of an electrical power-surge that occurred, and then later we were told that there were bombs that exploded on the tube-trains, and that it was an Al Quaeda terrorist attack, with Muslim suicide-bombers carrying backpack home-made explosive-devices onto the tube-trains.

A couple of weeks later, a Brazilian contract electrician is brutally and publicly murdered, on a tube-train, and again we are told lies by the police and media, about him.

For whom had he been working, and what had he been working on, in the days leading up to the 7th of July 2005?

Remember that the first reports from the media about 7/7/2005 were of an electrical power-surge, and Jean Charles de Menezes was a contract electrician.

Was he hired, as part of the terrorist exercise’s 1000 people, to wire up devices for mock-explosions, to be set off by a power-surge?

Did he see the explosive-devices being fastened under the tube-train carriage floors, and later realise what had really happened, and was starting to talk about it?

Did THEY (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) publicly execute him, to shut him up, and as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut?

We have been unable to find out where he worked. We know about his cousins who live in London, and his family coming over from Brazil, but we do not know where he worked.


Who is the person calling himself Richard Jones, and claiming to have been next to the suicide-bomber on the bus, and a witness to the bus-bombing, and why did he tell so many lies?

Why did Peter Power smirk, grin and giggle, when he spoke about the “coincidence”, that the exercise had turned out to be real, when lots of people had been killed and injured?

What is funny about that?

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: