Skip to content

Falsified New York Times Middle East Reports (on Libya)

August 21, 2011

“They appear daily like weeds on all topics. As a result, Times reports aren’t fit to read, let alone print. August 18 was no exception, publishing lies about Libyan insurgent victories.

On August 18, headlining, “Libyan Rebels Gain Control of Oil Refinery as Qaddafi Forces Flee,” Kareem Fahim’s article was pure Pentagon propaganda, duplicitously lying to readers.

Yet he said “(r)ebel fighters claimed complete control of a sprawling (Zawiyah) oil refinery, seizing one of (Gaddafi’s) most important assets after just three days of fighting and delivering the latest in a string of small victories that have suddenly put the rebels at Tripoli’s door.”

Reporting from Tripoli, independent Middle East/Central Asian analyst, Mahdi Nazemroaya refuted him, telling Progressive Radio News Hour listeners that:

— Gaddafi forces are winning;

— rebels are in disarray;

— the so-called National Transitional Council (NTC) is falling apart;

— Misrata was liberated from rebels;

— Tripoli is peaceful and calm, despite daily NATO bombing, willfully targeting civilians and nonmilitary sites;

— scattered fighting continues along routes to Tunisia and elsewhere;

— arteries between the two countries remain open;

— Intense Western propaganda wants to intimidate Gaddafi supporters to give up hope of prevailing;

— it’s had the opposite effect, in fact, galvanizing Libyans overwhelmingly behind Gaddafi, making him by far the most popular African/Middle East leader; and

— his forces control Gheryan, Sorman, Sabratha, and Zawiyah, its oil refinery and others; reports saying otherwise are lies; rebels are south of the city, not in it.

In an August 18 morning email, he added:

“Nothing has changed thus far. There is fighting in the area, but (rebels) do not have control. Bombings over Tripoli are very bad though.”

As part of NATO’s intimidation campaign, they continue daily, inflicting pain and suffering on Libyans unrelated to military necessity. As a result, they’re war crimes, what Times and other major media sources won’t explain.

Moreover, in times of war, the first casualty is duplicitous reporting, journalists lying for a living, prostituting themselves for a buck.

Daily The New York Times lies. So do other Western broadsheets, magazines, US television, the BBC, National Public Radio, Public Broadcasting, and other mainsteam sources, showing their managed news lacks credibility…”


Hypocrite appearing on the BBC, complaining that RT is state funded propaganda:

Maybe they need to be a “normal news gathering organisation”, much like the channels listed above…

One Comment leave one →
  1. September 18, 2011 11:21

    My thoughts precisely!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: