Skip to content

Iran and Israel in Nuclear Attack Ploy?

November 3, 2011

Take it or leave it I suppose…

“There is only one way to stabilize gasoline prices that are in “free fall,” closing the Straits of Hormuz, the narrow waterway serving Iraq, Kuwait and other Gulf States that is controlled militarily by Iran through its vast network of Silkworm missiles will do exactly that.

Such an act would hit just like a worldwide oil embargo and could be triggered in hours by any Israeli attack on Iran.

What had been seen, in the past, as a potential world disaster, is now just another way to make a quick buck, despite the fact that those involved are, at least according to stories in our press, “blood enemies.””

much much more http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/27/breaking-iran-and-israel-caught-partnering-in-attack-ploy/

Okay, there’s one thing that supports this story, that even a lot of ‘truthers’ don’t seem to understand for some reason (due to the excessive fixation on Israel?), and that is that Ahmadinejad is a crypto and would probably be a lot more at home in Israel.

(image source)

Iran is not an anti-NWO country in the same way that Putin’s Russia seems to be.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. November 6, 2011 03:58

    “Ahmadinejad is a crypto and would probably be a lot more at home in Israel.”
    I keep reading this but never read what are the supporting facts. Or even theories. I’ll take this opportunity to ask and find out (ps–ZATO supporting VT is not a credible source according to me). I’ll be back to read the answer. I would hate to support a crypto Jew.

    • November 6, 2011 07:10

      Thanks for your curiosity.

      Ahmadinejad was outed as a crypto when his real name came out.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6256173/Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-revealed-to-have-Jewish-past.html

      A couple of days later the press all of a sudden changed their tune and decided that he was ‘not a joo after all’.

      But ask yourself, who changes their name, and hides what it was changed from, except the ‘tribe’? What are the odds of someone changing their name, hiding the original, and then conveniently ending up in a position of immense political power? The cover-up is the best proof of the ‘crime’ (not that being a joo is a crime, but you get what I’m saying).

      This would not be a rare occurrence in middle eastern countries; see Sephardi Arabia, or the Donmeh of Turkey: http://www.henrymakow.com/turkeys_donmeh_are_illuminati.html

      If WW3 is the agenda, then Ahmadinejad is lined up nicely as the new Hitler figure – by which I mean, a) object of public enmity, b) someone who appears to be an ‘anti-c-mite’ and c) puppet who will start the war to make his country into the bad guy. I am concerned him or his allies will hit Israel, not because I give a damn about them (any more than they do about you or I), but simply because the middle east right now is a powderkeg for nuclear war and certainly is not worth one gentile life in any potential WW3.

      (Sort of related to what follows – http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/zionismpromotes.cfm)

      Speaking of Hitler, he was in all likelihood the grandson of a Rothschild (http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/hitler_was_a_rothschild.htm). He was a Zionist (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html) , and a pagan (http://freemasonrywatch.org/thenewage.html), and among the many people he did have killed were some ordinary hebrews, not the sacred six number but many thousands, and that was wrong.

      I support the hypothesis that “Hitler was a British Agent” (or perhaps, his advisors were). It would explain a few things about Dunkirk and the crazy, suicidal invasion of Russia. He is also said to have had strange fetishes about defecation and so on, but I guess that cannot be proven. On the plus side, he did have a usury-free, debt-slavery-free monetary system. So he was not as bad as Churchill, Stalin or Roosevelt/Eisenhower, all of whom committed or permitted mass atrocities to occur against the German people at the end of WW2. (Eisenhower’s Death Camps, Dresden, the rape of Berlin, to name some.)

      That said, I am much happier to see the back of Hitler and his (well actually he adapted it from the English aristocracy and their hebrew cousins) warmongering, eugenic, satanic, provocateur ideology that set the stage for the next 70 years of brainwashing, much as police goons dress as anarchists, smash things up, show the footage on the nightly news to outrage the sheeple, and then use that as a justification to beat up protestors the next day.

      I wish the Nazis had been peace loving and not so heathen and destructive, and invaded Britain instead of Russia, and routed out the Rothschilds’ global headquarters in London. (Heck, I wouldn’t mind speaking German, it’s a nice language, just as long as we have honest currency and there are no more Rotschild central banks!) That they didn’t, when they had every opportunity, speaks volumes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: