Skip to content

Delingpole – Communitarianism is a freedom-hating totalitarian philosophy like any other

August 19, 2011

“The most unsettling aspect of modern politics is that the Enemy is no longer plain in view. We may feel in our bones that we are as oppressed, disenfranchised and generally shat upon, in our way, as those who suffered under Nazism, Marxism and fascism. But the actual evidence doesn’t seem to bear this out.

We’re free to fly wherever we want on our hols. No one is starving. We can vote. There are no death camps. We don’t dread the small-hours knock at the door. Our politicians consult focus groups because they feel they ought to care what we think. There are lots of channels on TV, not all of which reflect the ideology of the state. Being Jewish, gay or an intellectual are not crimes. (More’s the pity in the case of the last one.) We can speak out against whomsoever we want (so long as they’re not Muslim) without fear of being arrested. We don’t need to belong to the Party to get a job. There are no bread queues. Our kids aren’t obliged to spy on us.

Why then do we yet feel so un-free? By ‘we’ I don’t mean all of us, of course. I can’t imagine, say, David Aaronovitch waking up every morning and gnashing into his Coco Pops over the liberties Big Government is taking with his liberty. I doubt Michael Moore, Paul Krugman or the environment pod at the Guardian have ever done anything except shudder very pleasurably as the tentacles of state have crept ever deeper into their every orifice. But I’m guessing I’m not the only Speccie-reading type who surveys this brave new world we inhabit with growing alarm. ‘I do hope it’s no more than my imagination,’ we say to ourselves. ‘But it seems to me that, politically, we are ****ed.’… ”

http://www.spectator.co.uk/columnists/all/7045153/communitarianism-is-a-freedomhating-totalitarian-philosophy-like-any-other.thtml

(all on one page here) http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/columnists/all/7045153/communitarianism-is-a-freedomhating-totalitarian-philosophy-like-any-other.thtml

h/t Living Outside The Dialectic

http://www.askfactmaster.com/Positive_rights

An Honest Reading From Canada

August 18, 2011

http://pirate.is/alangreenspan/2011/08/18/rad-update-21/

One person responds to this video,

“I totally have a problem with this. That would mean that your area has a higher radioactivity, per square meter, than  Fukushima city. This is either an error, something local whcih got specifically on your pannels, or otherwise. [AdamS note – or the Jap and US and Canadian govts don’t want to ‘panic’ their people by revealing the actual level of radiation, either in Japan itself or ‘downwind’]

You should contact the local Canadian EPA if you find readings that high. Your entire property would be unsafe to live on.

I have extream trouble beliving this one.

Please contact your local authorities for everyone else’s sake if this is true.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counts_per_minute

Bear in mind that it has already come out that there was a spike in baby deaths in the northwest US: http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-northwest-sees-35-infant-mortality-spike-postfukushima-20110617,0,5968165.story

And that, well, let’s just say it’s probably not a good idea to trust the authori-ties: http://newsworldwide.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/fukushima-highly-radiated-united-states-water-food-cover-up-by-feds-continues/

But no, it’s the crazy goy..er, guy with the meter who is wrong, he thinks that the radiation is dangerous. Probably a conspiracy theorist as well. Ha, ha, ha. We know governments never endanger their own people and that nuclear is safe. Only a few dozen people died after Chernobyl of course, says Glenn Beck. It wasn’t a million. Hahaha.

All the nuclear testing and nuclear plants everywhere constantly leaking radiation, and the use of DU munitions in our glorious foreign wars, have nothing to do with the global cancer epidemic. Oh, no sir. And there is no global elite who want to reduce the world population by 5-6 billion by their own admission. Don’t listen to the fearmongering on the internet, but make sure you listen to our fearmongering about terrorism and crime on the tv news. Be more like the troops. Just breathe in the beautiful dust and stop asking questions.

Ron Paul 2012. “He Can’t Win”™

August 17, 2011

– While I don’t encourage the messianic belief that voting someone into power will alone fix things, Paul is one of the few political figures the world over that I might vote for. –

There’s something about these people of the tribe, they have to be at the forefront of everything even if they’re not entirely in control. Perhaps the greatest Englishmen in history are most of the founding fathers of America and some of the later presidents like Jackson and Lincoln and Kennedy (well he was related to qe2, though it’s odd to think of him as ‘english’ – ‘engbrew’ perhaps) who were attempted-/murdered by the Criminal Rothschilds. None of these people were saints, definitely Kennedy was hated by many and did do some bad things politically, as well as personally, but what matters is in the end he gave his life trying to end the war, shut down the Fed and boot the banksters back across the atlantic from whence they came. And not forgetting his brother who of course did the same. As Jackson said of his greatest accomplishment, “I killed the bank”, and that’s what matters.

So, even the purest (not perfect) revolution in history, that of America, had to be led by masons, many of  whom were great people and as close as you are going to get to benevolent, in the political sphere. Washington shunned the prospect of wielding tyrannical power to go back to his farm, for instance. (bear in mind he was descended from slavers.) Seems even among the most powerful families, sometimes relatively good people are born.

(the tea party was started in 2006-7 by 9/11 truthers and libertarians and antiwar people…only in 2009 was it taken over by the fox news machine and ‘neoconned’ to an extent – although arguably it has not been completely co-opted.)

Which brings us forth to Ron Paul quite nicely, does it not. Guaranteed, any major movement – whether that be the liberty movement in America, the anti-EU movement over here, any movement that is (to any extent) against the NWO and anglozionist banker occupation, will be led by anglohebrew people, either as agent provocateurs or as well meaning masonic place men, or both. I do not underestimate the sincerity of Paul, he has stuck to his message like he is set in stone, for three or four decades. Just like with Alex Jones, there’s no way anyone could do three hours of empassioned radio like he does every day and not believe in what you’re doing. Sure Paul may be a mason, but then a lot of people are masons, and not all of them are bad. Arguably being as prominent as either of those figures are, you’re bound to come into contact with tptb to an extent. Not saying that being a mason is good, of course it’s not, but maybe Paul wouldn’t be where he is if not for being one.

I mean, I’ve run through all the scenarios I can think of, and there is really nothing to lose from Paul being elected president. Because, if it isn’t him then guaranteed it will either be one of the neocons, or Obama (I repeat myself). If he turns in any way then people will see that, because he’s the only candidate (except other small ones) that is principle based not personality based (i.e. for fluoride heads). If he gets screwed out of the election by (electronic) vote rigging, then that can be exposed. And people get educated. There’s no doubt, I would not be writing this blog in the manner I am, if not for Ron Paul. No doubt. And many of you are in the same ‘boat’ so to speak.

The only thing that’s playing on my mind is maybe he is tptb’s choice to ‘manage’ the dissolution of America. Recall those maps that went around a few years ago of Russia and China and the EU and/or Mexico all getting pieces of a broken-up America. I don’t know what to say about that. Could look at it as disinfo to scare you into opposing states rights, or the opposite – a very serious plan to be implemented under the veil of states rights. To be fair, RP has opposed all the ‘free trade’ and NAU agenda. He also called out the cia for drug dealing.

(still think he’s the best candidate by far. Bachmann the hebrew tax enforcer, Rick Perry the globalist friend of Al Gore, Romney the inspiration for Obamacare, er…Palin, errr……Obama, it’s a no brainer.)

Btw, can you imagine what it must be like to keep getting re-elected and going into the belly of the beast, into the lions’ den, as RP has done for decades, to speak the truth? If I were a masonic operative, I’d turn the job down, frankly, unless I really believed something good would come out of it.

I doubt very much Paul will actually be elected president, because of the rigging, but the most important thing is the education that comes with all this. Even TV zombies can understand when someone is talking sense to them. (Okay, they might be a little intimidated by the prospect of thinking for themselves, but they can’t ignore everything that’s going on for much longer.)

I have very rarely if ever covered RP this past year, and the reason for this is, I realised that you in America already have more than enough people from this little island telling you how you should run your country and who to elect, and that that fact is a large part of the problem. I’m thinking partly of John Cleese telling Americans to vote for Obama the royals’ economic assassin last time around, and that they’re stupid if they don’t. I’m thinking much more broadly about anglozionist domination of your government and media, to the point that even the best candidate for prez has to come from that group.

Cenk Uygur – America’s Nuclear Nightmare

August 17, 2011

One of the better Soros talking heads, certainly. Thanks for telling more of the truth.

UK Riots: Black student explains truth to Boris Johnson

August 16, 2011

I don’t think it’s good that we look to government as some kind of financial saviour. But still, it’s not wrong to plead for your money back from the government (maybe a little futile, but not wrong). Austerity = pay more in, get less out, and more money for the banksters and other corporate cronies attached to the state. ‘Tax Freedom Day‘. How Orwellian.

Of course, the money ‘going to Libya’ is not ‘to help Libya’, it’s going to a bunch of criminal terrorist Al-CIAda thugs trying to overthrow Gaddafi on behalf of the crown, since he was going off script and didn’t buy the 9/11 story and was wanting to nationalise oil and kick out BP, Exxon etc.

Thankfully, Gaddafi armed his people so they could defend themselves against the crown’s thugs. That’s definitely more than can be said for the UK government during these riots.

Innocence 101

August 16, 2011

Or, why all gentiles must die, according to the globalists. This one coming at ya from the pacific coast of America, aka the Fukushima primary kill zone (alongside Japan itself).

Molyneux on Condemning the British Rioters

August 16, 2011

“Can we really blame the kids for eliminating the middle man [from the statist system], and simply taking stuff from the productive themselves?”

Back in 2005

August 16, 2011

The wide eyes gently fell shut, masking the sunlight which was shining through the blind.

We are very dependent on other people, and not in a good way. Most of us anyway, we are reliant on people, strangers, who we don’t know, who provide our food, energy, even our knowledge via the media.

Why should we trust these strangers? Wouldn’t it be easier if everyone was independent?, mused juvenile AdamS.

Visions were constructed – well, not supernatural visions, but imaginations – of how anyone could possibly be ‘freed from civilisation’ in today’s age.

Hmm. A caravan. Well you’d need a solar panel. A sufficiently large area of land. May have to hook up to the mains for water and sewage.

(with hindsight, a well would take out the water problem.)

But you’d still have to pay taxes on the land. Is that fair? Even if you’re not using anything else, you could be in the middle of nowhere, but apparently all land belongs to the government and you simply ‘rent’ it, you can never truly own it.

Perhaps it’s not so bad, instead of going to all that trouble, to just have faith in the system, be an office jockey, and then exchange the pretty paper you are rewarded with all the ‘strangers’, to get by – that’s what everyone else does.

But there’s another thing. This pretty paper. I mean, it has nice font and colours on it, and elaborate designs, and a fugly picture of our german queen, said juvenile AdamS, but isn’t it odd how it seems to buy things that took a lot more effort to make than the paper itself? Coins, that’s one thing. Copper, whatever those other metals are, they have uses, we make things out of them, they are raw materials. But pretty paper? Does a £10 note really cost £10 to make? Surely not – and there’s no way a £20 note takes four times the labour/material to produce compared to a £5 note. No, something is wrong with this picture. Our money…

Our money is simply given a value by the Bank of England!

(Huh? What do you mean ‘fiat’? That’s a car manufacturer.)

Is that fair? If it costs, say, 20p to print one £20 note, then isn’t it going to be a little bit tempting to the people at the BoE to just print more and more? I know I would. And eventually wouldn’t that lead to so much of the money being available that it would be worth less?

But nobody else is talking about these things. Perhaps I’m just overthinking everything, sighed juvenile AdamS.

Are you paying attention son?

You have exams to study for, no time for slacking off now!

Oh well, gtg, Plato’s Cave is calling. Juvenile AdamS signing out.


This post made possible by John Dewey.

Links 15/Aug/11

August 15, 2011

“The World’s Safest Cookies” Baked by Fukushima School Kids

Israeli Spring – Guillotine on Rothschild Boulevard

Electronic Skin Tattoo with RFID Technology to Facilitate Monitoring

Be Cool Like These Mindless Robots…”Just Wave and Go”

well…maybe not ‘nothing but gold’…throw in land and blood too

Why is George Soros selling gold and buying farmland?

NATO’s Massacre at Majer, Libya

MI6 produced bogus Iraq war evidence under pressure from Downing Street

Zero tolerance: The moment armed officer holds a gun over the head of a 15-year-old boy on Manchester high street (which is now ‘necessary’ in the public’s mind after the riots…problem-reaction-solution as Icke would say)

Iceland’s new constitution written with help from social media…elitists horrified plebs allowed input

Bush and Clinton Counter-Terrorism Czar Alleges Massive 9/11 Cover Up

Eternal Damnation vs Universal Reconciliation

US Congress’ Israel Tour

Illuminati use cancer to hold us hostage

Makow keeps his dog’s gender a secret…

PS if you need confirmation that the elitists are very seriously insane and really do want you dead, make sure you at least watch a few minutes of the second part of “Technocalyps” which I linked yesterday. Tbh I linked it before watching it, but yesterday afternoon I saw all three parts. Man, the aussie (at least I think that’s what he is) hebraic guy is just nuts, talking about ‘building gods’ and how humans will have to die, and then there’s the other one who says he is going to become god and you’re not going to stop him. Just lunatics. These are the people who we trust to be at the forefront of science, like Dr Pianka who studies viruses while fantasising about 90% of humans being killed. I mean, put two and two together here…? Self preservation instinct stirring at all?

The Deification of Women

August 14, 2011

One thing you hear from feminists often is ‘the objectification of women’. This, we are told, is a central part of how females are oppressed by the patriarchy.

A few problems with that. Firstly, more often than not, women objectify themselves and judge themselves and each other based on appearance. Womens magazines are not part of ‘the patriarchy’, they are usually run by women (or homosexual males, that’s the stereotype anyway).

Secondly, it’s just not consistent to say:

“Don’t objectify me”

“It’s mean!”

“It’s bigoted!”

“It’s sexist!”

PS “How do I look? And you’d better give a good answer, quickly, so I don’t think you didn’t mean what you said”

So who is really doing the objectifying?

What I do agree on is that there is a real attempt to materialise everything in society to the point that humans are just meat. It’s not just women, although that is part of the agenda, but now you see they’re even trying the same trick with men. Look at some of the faggoty adverts around these days aimed at men, trying to teach them vanity. That is all part of the attempt to destroy your spirit and intellect and reduce you to base animalistic nihilism. Just read what the PUA people have to say, I guess that’s the new culture and the new values, huh. The sacred pussy.

Biologically speaking, men (or, ‘the patriarchy’) judged each other by the content of their character and their ‘alphaness’. And that’s actually what women do as well, as the PUA people say they will ‘shit test’ men, not because they consciously mean to, but because they are biologically primed to.  And they are only happy, oddly enough, when the man is strong willed enough to be ineffected by their trouble making. That makes a lot of sense.

Now I’m not saying that this system is a good thing, I’m just describing the biological reality. But where the PUA people go wrong is, we ought not to embrace baseness. Civilisation is about building, on top of that animalistic level, a culture. Reason. Compassion. Liberty. Justice. These things probably sound a little alien today, in fact they are the opposite of where we are going, collectively. (To the PUAs, higher cultural values are seen as ‘beta’, and thus ‘unmanly’, when really men ought to be the leaders in adopting these values. GBFM will explain more.)

And all this stems from the deification of women.

See, some point around the 60s or so, someone came up with the bright idea that women could do no wrong and were victims of men. Don’t believe me, look at the cases where women even commit murder, and feminist types will find some reason to blame the man for it, or blame ‘circumstances’, whereas if a man commits murder or whatever, the blame will be squarely with him (as it should be).

This brand of female supremacism, which is really what it is, ought to be criticised alongside white supremacism or zionist supremacism, as wrong and irrational. But we live in an age where Girls Rule and Boys Drool, which I would suggest is the problem.

(image source – heads up for people like me who can’t bear to read too much of that stuff)

And while discussing the deification of women (ever hear about ‘her inner goddess’? Are we being led via feminism into a form of worship?) I just have to include the WNs, yes again. You can learn a lot by reading SF, if you have a critical eye. And unofficial rule #1 is, no criticism of Our White Women is allowed! I mean, unless they’re RMxing or we find out they had a j grandparent. Then criticise away. But otherwise, no criticism permitted! After all, you might hurt someone’s feelings. You wouldn’t want to hurt the feelings of our poor pwecious White Women would you? No, then shut up.

Pedestalisation. Deification. But then, the female dominance extends further, because they’re going to dress how they like, and you still have to worship them, but if you as a male worship them incorrectly, as in you show pictures of them dressed how they like, you will still be condemned by the Goddess. Because, you are trying to degrade and objectify Our White Women again! Chauvinist pig.

(Feminism leads to a dead end.)

Y’know, at some point, you just have to say “FU! I’m not playing your games bitch!”

Secretly, that’s really what most of them want anyway, I reckon. Although they probably wouldn’t admit it.

But that’s why there is bisphenol-a, and various gender malforming pesticides and oestrogen mimickers (eg soya lecithin) in our food and water, to stop that from ever happening. Because the MALE elite believe they can control feminist, unfeminine women, and feminised men, more easily, all contained within a materialistic, intellectually dead culture.

“A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.” – Bertrand Russell

%d bloggers like this: