The Real Reason Why Most Political Bloggers Are Men
BBC asks – Political blogs: Why are they dominated by men?
Why do the vast majority of political
bloggers appear to be men?The flippant answer is that women probably have far better things to do with
their time. (what, like run all the ‘Mommy’ blogs? – AdamS)The reason given by the Hansard Society – which
has done some research on the matter – is hardly more flattering to the male
gender.“‘While writing and commenting on political blogs seems to be dominated by
men; it mirrors other offline and non-political activities such as writing
letters to newspapers for publication,” said Andy Williamson, Director of the
Hansard Society’s Digital Democracy programme.“Overall, the evidence for online politics suggests that the more an activity
involves self-promotion, the more likely there is to be a male dominance.“Where women are active in politics, they are equally as
likely as their male counterparts to be digitally active.”So are political bloggers the modern-day equivalent of the purple-faced
“Angry of Tunbridge Wells” types of newspaper letters-page legend?
Really it’s about as ludicrous as asking why most soldiers are men. Although, in case you haven’t noticed, feminazis (save for Code Pink, who I do often agree with) are not allowed to criticise the military, as that would spoil things for the state. Remember feminists – you are commie servants and criticism of the state is never allowed in your circles. Is it?
The reason why most political bloggers, indeed most politicians, and most soldiers, are men is the same really. That gender roles are biological and women are not naturally suited to doing these tasks. Imagine complaining that most cross stitchers are women, or most floralists. I mention cross stitch because I just remembered that we (ie boys and girls) were taught cross stitch in school. Unsurprisingly the girls were the best at such tasks and enjoyed them the most. We were also taught woodwork and metalwork, in mixed classes. Guess which gender tended to prefer that. (Actually I recall not liking and almost failing those. Does that make me effeminate? lol)
My point is that gender differences are not due to ‘sexism’, although obviously there are some men and women with bad attitudes towards the other (in fact I find feminists tend to be the ones with the most repulsive and frankly hateful views, eg the article above). Sometimes gender differences, ‘just are’, and trying to change them is futile, no matter how many foundations and educational curriculums and lawyer mafias are dedicated to the task.
“If I had a hammer, I’d smash the police state.”
WN Fail – Think About It Fellow Europeans
Aryan.
The modern use of the term popularised initially by Blavatsky.
Later by the Nasties, Runestone Hiss et al.
And today by WNs.
Taken from the ancient writings, the name of the white people who were in Asia.
And mixed with blacks to form what is today India.
Ironic, for a racial preservationist movement.
Is this an inside joke?
Let’s face it all they do is mislead Europeans into being crypto crown loyalists.
NOT Western at all. More like Middle Eastern.
Want to defend the West, best off ditching these charlatans.
Not Kosher, Not Anglophile,
–there are also a lot of nice blacks who are not into the commie bigotry they are force fed–
Not Supremacist, Not Satanist.
How you liek that biatches.
PS – did the Wiccamasonbaal Nastyists want intelligent whites to move into the Fukushima kill zone? Could they have known? Or is it just a convenient coincidence. I really don’t know. (Think b4 you click folks, if you’re IP conscious. NSFW, NSFPC, NSFTWDLCIAMOSSADMI6.)
Six Years Ago – Another Heinous Crime Was Committed.
WHEN
CORRUPTION BECOMES TREASONThe July
7.05 : 07.40 : Luton to London train was cancelled. The next train to London,
the 07.48, arrived at London King’s Cross at 08.42: seven minutes before the
detonations of the first explosives on the Underground.As the
cancellation could not have been foreseen and with it being far
too late to alter the plans, the police released the pre-prepared “four suicide
bombers took the 07.40 train” etc. statement.TONY
BLAIR, WITH REMARKABLE SPEED, ANNOUNCED THAT THERE WOULD BE NO PUBLIC INQUIRY.The
London Underground – entrances, platforms, carriages, escalators – has
saturation CCTV coverage. No footage showed any evidence of “suicide bombers”.The “four
bombers outside Luton Station” photograph – “taken from the” non-existent “CCTV
footage” – is an infantile fake : at least three of the four images have been
Photoshopped in : white-hat-man has been particularly-badly superimposed with
his body in front of the railings and half of his face and lower left arm behind
the rails : the rail sections, either side of the phantom, do not line up : at a
busy time no-one else is on the photo.Eye-witness
reports tell of the explosions on the underground being on the rail-tracks :
effectively ruling out any external party involvement. “The policeman said ‘mind
that hole, that’s where the bomb was’. THE METAL WAS PUSHED UPWARDS as if the
bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag,
but I don’t remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag”. Bruce
Lait, Cambridge Evening News .“I knew
it was a bomb … A second later and the explosion would have
punched a hole in our carriage … our driver .. opened the outer door and LOOKED
AT THE TRACK AHEAD. There were huge pieces of metal, which had been ripped out
of their rivets, lying about.”“ … there
was a woman .. who was on her back, trapped in the
metal WHICH HAD TWISTED UP
THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE CARRIAGE. The roof
was still on but the lining of the carriage had been blown off … there was a big
hole in the middle of the floor.” POLICE WOMAN Lizzie
Kenworthy.“An
Israeli security firm has been chosen to provide security for London’s
Underground train network. … Verint Systems, … Israeli security companies
are usually manned by Shinbet or Mossad ex-agents …”.By the
greatest of coincidences, an “anti-terrorism exercise” was
being undertaken at the same time as the “suicide bombers” struck with the same
targets at the same time.The
announcement that it was, obviously, military explosives that were used, was
quickly changed to “home made” : then followed farcical raids on “home-made-bomb-factory-houses”
in Yorkshire etc. TATP MADE IN A BATHTUB.Stagecoach employees have reported that the no. 30 bus – the
one which had the explosive device under the top- deck back-seat – was the only
bus diverted after the tube explosions . The previous Saturday, a maintenance
group, previously unknown to the depot crew, spent “20 hours” “on CCTV
maintenance” on that bus ; an unheard-of length of time for that
task.There has
never been any evidence, whatsover, linking the explosions with Islam or the
mythical “Al Qaeda”.On July
21 a “failed suicide bombing” stunt was staged .This was to further the idea
that “home-made” bombs were used in the July 7 attacks. It also provided the
chance to eliminate a witness to the July 7 reality.The Brazilian contract electrician, Jean Charles de
Menezes, executed by agents, probably had inside knowledge of the placing of the
devices and/or the mechanisn – “It was like a huge electric surge ..” Bruce Lait
– which triggered the explosives.After 8
weeks and with the “suicide bombers” story falling further apart, the BBC Arabic
Service, Al Jazeera, broadcast a “suicide bomber” video ; an obvious fake,
parotted, uncritically, by the media. The police/BBC later came up with a
“bomber reconnoitre” video and more Al-Qaeda claims.After 12
weeks the State produced an eye-witness to a suicide bomber detonating a bomb on
the tube.On Oct
28, BBC 2 TV – Horizon allowed ARIEL MERRARI of TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY, MARC
SAGEMAN, producer/director ALICKY SUSSMAN and editor, ANDREW COHEN to give us
another large helping of the Muslim-killer version, complete with the Photoshop
Four photograph.
(Click through to the source for full unabridged version with links. Likewise below.)
http://london.southeastasianews.org/plantedevidence091108.html
Witnesses of the tube-train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks, and no backpacks, or bags, left unattended on the trains, in the carriages that blew up, and that the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains.
Explosives underneath the train floors; powerful enough to rupture the carriage floors and bend them upwards; would also lift the carriages up off the rails and derail them, as did happen.
Those explosives were not home-made, but military-grade high-explosives, that would not be available to Muslim suicide-bombers.The official story was that they used home-made explosives, which has later been proven to be a lie.
So we know, from reliable eye-witnesses, who can be traced, that there were no backpack home-made bombs or Muslim bombers inside the tube-train carriages that blew up, and that the floors blew upwards, so the bombs, which were made from military high-grade explosives, must have been fastened underneath the floors of the train carriages.Only people having access to the tube-trains, during the times that the trains were not running, would be able to plant those bombs, under the train floors.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Finance Minister, said that he was warned by Scotland Yard; not to leave his hotel-room, on the morning of 7/7/2005, before the first explosion was reported; implying that they had foreknowledge of the plan.
Scotland Yard then quickly denied being the ones who provided the warning, but have not told us who did warn Netanyahu, if they did not.
Why was Benjamin Netanyahu warned, but not the British people who pay their wages, and whom they are paid to protect?
Was it because it would have spoiled their evil plan, to murder British people, to change the nation’s mind, about British troops fighting in the Middle-East?
Two weeks later the head of the Israeli Mossad, General Meir Dagan, said that he had warned Benjamin Netanyahu at 08.40 AM, on 7/7/2005, ten minutes before the first blast occurred.
How did he know what was going to happen in London, if Scotland Yard did not warn him?
Did he wait, to warn Benjamin Netanyahu, until it was too late to warn the British people, so as not to spoil their evil plan?
Was the London bombing a covert MI5 operation, or an Israeli Mossad operation, or a joint operation by both of them?
The British people have the right to know.
Tony Blair said on the day of the explosions, that, “We KNOW this was done in the name of Islam”, when there was no proof whatsoever of who had done it, therefore indicating he possibly had foreknowledge of the plan and who they intended to blame, and the reason why they were going to blame the Muslims.
As proof that this was a slip-up, and needed covering up, look at how the BBC later falsely reported his actual words, giving further proof that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and the coverage was “organised”, exactly as Michael Portillo said it would be, in the BBC Panorama programme in May 2004.
“In addition I welcome the statement that has been put out by the Muslim Council of Great Britain. We know that these people act in the name of Islam…”
“In addition, I welcome the statement put out by the Muslim Council who know that those people acted in the name of Islam…”
Later that same day, Efraim Halevi, a former head of the Israeli Mossad, wrote in an article published on the Jerusalem Post website, at 18:10 PM (London time), that the attacks had been carried out simultaneously with “near-perfect” execution.
How did he know they had only been “near-perfect”?
How could he have known what the “perfect” results should have been, in order to know that the actual results were not perfect, unless he was in on the plot?
How many more people had they intended to murder, in order for it to be considered “perfect” execution?
How did he know, at least two days before the London authorities released the information on the 9th of July, that the bombs were detonated simultaneously, unless he was in on the plot?
As proof that this too was a slip-up, the Jerusalem Post article in question was completely removed from their website, after people began to ask similar questions.
The following day Police Commissioner Ian Blair also made a slip-up, on camera, and said that there were four miserable bombers, and then very quickly corrected himself, showing that he too possibly had foreknowledge of the plan to use four Muslims as patsies.
We are told that the first reports were of an electrical power-surge that occurred, and then later we were told that there were bombs that exploded on the tube-trains, and that it was an Al Quaeda terrorist attack, with Muslim suicide-bombers carrying backpack home-made explosive-devices onto the tube-trains.
A couple of weeks later, a Brazilian contract electrician is brutally and publicly murdered, on a tube-train, and again we are told lies by the police and media, about him.
For whom had he been working, and what had he been working on, in the days leading up to the 7th of July 2005?
Remember that the first reports from the media about 7/7/2005 were of an electrical power-surge, and Jean Charles de Menezes was a contract electrician.
Was he hired, as part of the terrorist exercise’s 1000 people, to wire up devices for mock-explosions, to be set off by a power-surge?
Did he see the explosive-devices being fastened under the tube-train carriage floors, and later realise what had really happened, and was starting to talk about it?
Did THEY (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) publicly execute him, to shut him up, and as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut?
We have been unable to find out where he worked. We know about his cousins who live in London, and his family coming over from Brazil, but we do not know where he worked.
Why?
Who is the person calling himself Richard Jones, and claiming to have been next to the suicide-bomber on the bus, and a witness to the bus-bombing, and why did he tell so many lies?
Why did Peter Power smirk, grin and giggle, when he spoke about the “coincidence”, that the exercise had turned out to be real, when lots of people had been killed and injured?
What is funny about that?
http://london.southeastasianews.org/plantedevidence091108.html
Globalists’ Australian Nexus
^says it all really, huh? (image source)
A globalist rat’s nest amidst the rise of Asia.
by Tony Cartalucci
Bangkok, Thailand July 5, 2011 – Meet the Lowy Institute. Filled with big business interests and perhaps the most degenerate, depraved minds humanity has yet produced, it poses as an “independent international policy think tank,” whose objective is to “generate new ideas and dialogue on international developments and Australia’s role in the world.” The word “independent” is somewhat confusing, but what is clear is that it is yet another Fortune 500 run policy and propaganda clearinghouse serving not Australia, but rather the global corporate-financier elite.Notable corporate members include JP Morgan, Rothschild, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, and Cheveron. While Australian brands like Qantas, BHP Billiton, and the National Australian Bank appear more “indigenous” in nature, the reality is that their boards, like everything in the globalist realm, are an ongoing game of musical chairs between all of the worlds globalist, multinational corporations. For example, BHP Billiton’s board of directors alone features Jacques Nasser, formerly of Ford Motor Company and JP Morgan, John Buchanan formally of British Petroleum and Vodafone, Carlos Cordeiro formally of Goldman Sachs, David Crawford formally of Bank of America, and the list goes on and on.
The Lowy Institute’s board of directors is something to behold. Sitting at the top, is 80 year-old, accused tax evader, Australian-Israeli Frank Lowy, after whom the institute is named. He currently oversees the Westfield Group, was a board member of the Reserve Bank of Australia, and sits upon the board of directors of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) – not of Australia, but of Israel. Joining him is son Peter Lowy, who is also a Lowy Institute board member, a RAND Corporation trustee, and a board member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council – not of Australia, but of the United States….
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/07/globalists-australian-nexus.html
Eric Dubay – Masonic Takedown!
Paisley on the Vatican/Jesuits
He is a crown loyalist which is probably why he gets away with saying what he says and Lou Dobbs gets threatened for merely making a passing mention. Although that was on TV so I guess that was different.
http://www.chroniclewatch.com/2011/07/02/ian-paisley-teaches-on-the-jesuits/
Keeps within the frame of the Catholic vs Protestant conflict, which was essentially an old version of the cold war (that is, an overblown divide and conquer game with the manipulators largely running both sides). It does make him seem a little hypocritical, talking about ‘Catholic’ orders while cheerleading for the Orange/Masonic occupiers of Ulster, who surely are just as bad, yet supposedly ‘Protestant’. But, as I said, you’d be hard pressed to find anyone else covering this stuff. Perhaps Jordan Maxwell to an extent.
A Zionist. Probably a high priest of Brith’ish Isarel. Lap dog of HM. I don’t like the man. But in this case the info is worth it.
Charlie Veitch’s Brilliant Heel Turn
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! (throws paper cups)
You have drawn heat.
Federal Jack
July 1, 2011“There isn’t any evidence for 9/11 being an inside job.”
Back in 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Cass Sunstein co-wrote a paper titled “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures” proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and “independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other activist groups that have “anti-government conspiracy theories” and his primary target is the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Cass Sunstein now works for the Obama Administration. This brings us back to today.
The founder of the Love Police Charlie Veitch has released a new video where he says he no longer believes 9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMopKnT_V5c
In this new video, made just 11 days after Charlie attended an event his girlfriend helped organize, that brought Richard Gage from AE911Truth to Cambridge University, we see and hear Charlie say after 5 years he has changed his mind and he doesn’t think 9/11 was an inside job. He thinks the Government was caught with “their pants around their ankles” just like the official conspiracy theory.
Charlie Veitch on what he called a paid trip by BBC changes his mind about the 9/11 terror attacks. He claims that there is NO evidence for controlled demolition! He then goes on to talk about how people are filled with hate and hang onto their conspiracy theories.
Intel Hub Note: Due to the fact that in the past we have posted videos by Charlie we feel it is our duty to let our viewers see what he now stands for and make up their OWN mind.
Go join your mate Danny in the sin bin, you naughty person.
You maybe need to learn from the masters though.
Wildfires threaten to ignite 30000 barrels of plutonium waste at New Mexico nuclear weapons facility
Oh isn’t this just a g-funkin marvellous ‘coincidence’. You wait two decades for a(nother) nuclear catastrophe and then two or three come at once. All of a sudden it seems like nuke plants almost want to fall over.
http://www.naturalnews.com/032871_wildfires_plutonium.html
Funny, I have observed many of the enviro/gaia/veganish types talking about how (insert appropriate divinity here) is responsible for this, to ‘punish’ humans for having nuclear plants. I suppose that gives the culprits of this chao a rather jolly larf. No, a few crazy Brithish Isarelists, with stolen advanced technology, does not a divinity make.
Brainwashing
Piers Corbyn forecasts major event June 27-July 2
First of all I hope you can see from this video the total BS being peddled (by the presenter) to attempt to provide an explanation for all the strange weather ‘anomalies’ going on, without facing the reality of weather weaponry.
Maybe I’m just being prejudiced, but I wonder to what extent Corbyn has the inside line on this. Certainly however he tells a lot of truth about many things including the fiction of ‘manmade global warming’, and the sun being central to the climate. But recently there have been a whole chain of weather events (note the tornadoes and flooding in the US lately, and the unusual Russian heatwave last year that wrecked much of their crops), that in combination with the way these crown stooge reporters have covered them, leave one with little doubt that weather weapons are in play, and who ultimately is using them.
Is Corbyn, intentionally or otherwise, giving cover for the weather warmongers?
